<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Brian Magierski - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-864465fb" type="application/json"/><link>http://bkm.disqus.com/</link><description>Entrepreneurial finance, venture capital, debt, mergers &amp; acquisitions, and more - brian.magierski.com</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:33:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Residential real estate dynamics</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2006/09/05/residential-real-estate-dynamics/#comment-12066565</link><description>Well what more can we expect Because of continuous economic downturn, many realtors and business establishment were engaged in financial issues, they tend to get big loans in order for their business to survive in this time of depression.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">realestate13</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:33:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Residential real estate dynamics</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2006/09/05/residential-real-estate-dynamics/#comment-10156718</link><description>honestly, i don't think the price of real estate will drop that much. cause there's no much for them to drop</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">costa_rica_real_estate</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:56:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Media Marketing - what is it good for?</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2008/02/13/social-media-marketing-what-is-it-good-for/#comment-5093916</link><description>Brian - interesting article.  My experience has been that Social Media does provide targeted information, but it's dependent on relationships.  In order to market through Social Media, you have to build relationships with readers by providing good, non-sales based content.  I suspect that the Social Media users of today can smell a sales pitch a mile away, so you have to break those barriers to establish trust and credibility.  Of course, this is easier said then done as I don't really think I've done a very good job of it myself. In my humble opinion, this is the key to marketing via Social Media.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">businesssupply</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:11:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: links for 2008-12-29</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2008/12/29/links-for-2008-12-29/#comment-4810721</link><description>Great to see you both here commenting on my lazy blogging .... del.icio.us auto posts of my links!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed it's deja vu all over again with Wall St.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bmagierski</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:26:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: links for 2008-12-29</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2008/12/29/links-for-2008-12-29/#comment-4810302</link><description>And Gordon Gekko.  Le plus ca change...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">itsinsider</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:31:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: links for 2008-12-29</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2008/12/29/links-for-2008-12-29/#comment-4735510</link><description>Really disturbing when you think about it. Was just lamenting to my dad about how much the "Wall Street" moniker has fallen in its regard. Right down there with used car salesmen, auto execs and Congress.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Elmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:49:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: links for 2008-11-24</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2008/11/24/links-for-2008-11-24/#comment-3998306</link><description>Doh! Thanks, didn't notice that ... popped up on Google Alerts...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bmagierski</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:47:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: links for 2008-11-24</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2008/11/24/links-for-2008-11-24/#comment-3995816</link><description>hey.  you bookmarked a splog.  (don't encourage them!) the "uncertain times" piece is from Jevon's blog. &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/3hvfgj" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/3hvfgj&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">susan scrupski</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:30:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Model to enable Information Arbitrage?</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2006/07/29/model-to-enable-information-arbitrage/#comment-3743724</link><description>first step in successfully implementing Information Arbitrage to power an investment strategy. The topic modeling would need to monitor for</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Artificial</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:35:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Residential real estate dynamics</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2006/09/05/residential-real-estate-dynamics/#comment-3564275</link><description>heard this description so many times, you’d think the&lt;br&gt; adjustment would be quicker each time around, &lt;br&gt;yet it always seems to play out this</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">REAL ESTATE</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:08:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Plaxo and the Art of Successful Service Recovery</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2006/10/26/plaxo-and-the-art-of-successful-service-recovery/#comment-3281142</link><description>Well, I am glad you had your problem resolved efficientley, I have been trying to solve a problem with them for more than 3 months. I sent them another email today, to add to my file on their lack of response. I really like their service, when it works for me. Initially AFTER emailing several times, they told me the problem was that I had too many contacts in my contact folder so they had disabled my account. I worked with a rep to remove most of the contacts and it worked for about a week. Now I am still getting the error message that says they are experiencing problems and I can't sign in or look at profiles or anything. I am wondering if I am the only on getting this message or if other people are experiencing problems. They tell me I can sign on to vip services to get the number to call, however, when I try to sign into the service I get the error message!!! &lt;br&gt;Not a Happy Camper!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">AngieT</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:57:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rackspace Prices IPO</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2008/08/08/rackspace-prices-ipo/#comment-2245169</link><description>Brian - as my profs at HBS, Lerner &amp; Hardymon taught me a few years ago - value creation through innovation and unfair advantage are the ultimate determinant of market value.  Recently, I've seen very few deals go through, even on the High-tech M&amp;A side, because they lacked a clear vision.  Kudos to you and the nGenera SMT for picking ones that will drive growth and enhance shareholder value.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We'll see if the recent pattern of IPOs above $100M will trickle down to smaller offerings, though.  I've yet to see it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Hooks</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 10:11:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Enterprises are using Twitter</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2008/07/08/how-enterprises-are-using-twitter/#comment-1099319</link><description>These are clearly emerging case studies of how enterprises are making use of Social Media, but are certainly harbingers of great things to come. Many of the highlighted use cases are for customer engagement, which means the enterprises are recognizing the growing voice and power of their customer base due to the Web 2.0 technology revolution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;shabby&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.treatmentcenters.org/massachusetts"rel="dofollow" rel="nofollow"&gt;Massachusetts Treatment Centers&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">papput</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 04:21:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Forstmann&amp;#8217;s view on the credit crisis</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2008/07/07/forstmanns-view-on-the-credit-crisis/#comment-828303</link><description>Frightening! This also extends to the Federal Government and how they have allowed the dollar to devalue. It certainly makes our debt cheaper over time. You may recall that OPEC had a fit when we went off the gold standard and then decided to peg oil to gold. The problem is, there's not enough gold to match even what is in circulation in the U.S. (around $4 trillion). Gold would have to double in price, just as oil has. There is a lot going on here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SteveElmore</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:15:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Enterprise Software discussion buzzing last week</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2008/05/03/social-enterprise-software-discussion-buzzing-last-week/#comment-515361</link><description>Well said</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff Dachis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 23:45:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Enterprise Software discussion buzzing last week</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2008/05/03/social-enterprise-software-discussion-buzzing-last-week/#comment-418613</link><description>Thanks Oliver - great comment. I agree that IBM page is not impressive in&lt;br&gt;the least, and the timeframe question for the big players is the real&lt;br&gt;question. All have a placeholder for sure because they have to, but many&lt;br&gt;lack commitment - in the ham &amp; eggs analogy, they are the eggs. This&lt;br&gt;includes Sharepoint despite the civil defense force you mention. The&lt;br&gt;Sharepoint story seems to their typical play - rather than just have a&lt;br&gt;placeholder, they deliberately seed something inside their customers into&lt;br&gt;which will grow whatever needs to grow to dominate that part of the customer&lt;br&gt;infrastructure over whatever timeframe it takes them to figure it out.&lt;br&gt;I agree with your comment - we are seeing the natural evolution in market&lt;br&gt;development in play here - from Education to Custom Solution development to&lt;br&gt;more packaged Applications / Solutions. We're probably in between the&lt;br&gt;Education and Custom Solution development stage, with collaborative&lt;br&gt;processes now being defined in some enterprises / industries, and custom&lt;br&gt;solutions being developed on these infrastructure toolsets - wikis, blogs,&lt;br&gt;forums, social nets, Sharepoint : ) - and single sign-on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dennis is probably right, these infrastructure players get consolidated into&lt;br&gt;the infrastructure. Alongside that, new application / social enterprise apps&lt;br&gt;providers will emerge building the next generation apps leveraging this web&lt;br&gt;middleware. All in all, a fun time to be in the market.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bmagierski</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:34:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social Enterprise Software discussion buzzing last week</title><link>http://brian.magierski.com/2008/05/03/social-enterprise-software-discussion-buzzing-last-week/#comment-415172</link><description>Very cogent and coherent contribution to this debate.  Conventional wisdom of course is that the big dogs- Oracle, IBM, MSoft et al, will ultimately provide the underlying infrastructure for collaboration with other players either subsumed or in niche roles augmenting big player platforms. &lt;br&gt;Assuming for a moment this is how things play out the bigger question then becomes in what timeframe. In my earlier post you cite above, I deliberately linked to an IBM 'collaboration' page that was less than impressive. I know IBM are planning big things but no one challenged my post, unlike the sharepoint civil defense force who are vigilantly scanning the horizon for comments about their baby.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The reality is most enterprises are not ready for fully formed 'solution' suites at this point in time. We are in a fascinating era where collaboration processes and procedures are still evolving - software represents the functionality required from this thinking and at this point the solution is often a combination of different apps under single sign on for specific goals. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There clearly will be consolidation and shake out in this space which is set to be joined by yet more me-to apps as the consumer web 2.0 bubble deflates and attempts are made to rationalize 'social' in the enterprise. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I'm seeing on the ground today  as an enterprise collaboration consultant recommending appropriate sets of tools for a given set of client needs is diversity. This diversity is typical solved with an amalgamation of appropriate solutions, usually under single sign on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's no question suites are coming as we rationalize but that day hasn't arrived. Yet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">oliver marks</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 23:58:57 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>